|
|
Home | TOC | Previous | Next | Download
The
attorney may decide to employ strategies to cull discovery. These include
deduplication and use of keywords and date ranges. We also prefer to receive
two databases: a privileged and a non-privileged database. The legal team may
provide the vendor with privileged keywords, such as attorney names, in order
to help the team identify and review documents which do not contain privileged
terms but do meet other criteria.
Home | TOC | Previous | Next | Download
Contact Ad Litem
(C)2005 Ad Litem Consulting, Inc.
|
About Litigation Support Technical Standards
This document was initially designed to eliminate any discrepancy between firm technical needs and how the vendor created the technical aspect of their products. Litigation Support spends needless hours changing the vendor delivery. The firm pays for product that litigation support will have to modify. Today, the document covers as many technical requirements as possible for as many types of discovery and software as possible.
To get a good idea of the reason for these explicit directions, please visit the final section of this document entitled, “Things not to do”. All of these examples are from real life. All of these examples caused headaches, delaying reviews, productions and more.
I hope that this document is helpful to you.
|
Template by Steves Templates
|
|